This is an average age of people who filled out the questionnaires. As it took place in college, a lot of people that filled in the questionnaire were 16 or 17. So we thought it best to simply make another column for people older than those two categories. We found that the majority of people asked were older than 18. But we still have a good cross section of ages.
2.
We asked if the audience preferred simply a narrator over a presenter that talks to the viewer directly. Thankfully the preference swayed to a narrator as this is the format we intend to use. We were advised to used this option regardless, but we were grateful that our audience agrees with our decision.
We asked if the audience preferred a more personal voice of their narrator, who they can relate to. If they preferred someone who represents a voice of authority so that their information seems more reliable. They favoured the more relatable voice over. So its very likely that one of our own group members will take on that role.
4.
We left questions about your favorite channels. But unfortunately we forgot to specify that it was meant for the terrestrial channels only. So we grouped the channels that fell into the digital category together. Regrettably that category came out on top, so we decided to go with the runner up as far as preference went. we chose channel 4.
We made tick boxes for this question so that the subjects could tick their preferred time of day for our documentary to air. The results show that almost everyone wants it to show in the evening. So we decided it will be hammocked with two of the most popular shows on channel four.6.
We asked the audience if they themselves classed blindness as a true disability. Shockingly the results were not as one sided as we presumed. With an entire 40% not counting blindness as a disability. Realistically, anyone who is legally blind has the right to be classed as physically disabled.
7.
We wanted to find out how people would feel if they woke up with no eyesight. We had a lot of different answers, but we managed to generalise them into two main categories. 'Scared' and 'Sad'. There was one outlier to the normal results from someone who simply said, they'd feel "WEIRD".
8.
We asked if the audience preferred simple, straight-forward graphics, or if they liked more interesting and complex graphics. The results were in favour of complex. We will have to see to what extent what we can incorporate into our documentary. It will depend on our own ability with the program we are using, as well as the limitations within it.
9.
We wanted to find out if our audience preferred glasses or contact lenses. This can show peoples attitudes towards wearing glasses in general. We found out that 80% said they preferred contact lenses. Which means they are far less popular than we anticipated.
10.
We asked if the audience could live without their eyesight if it were suddenly taken from them. Unsurprisingly a massive 93% said that there was no way they could get by without their vision. But 7% said the could easily manage without the use of their eyes.11.
We also wanted to know if the opticians brought about similar feelings to going to the dentists. 37% said that they didn't mind going or that they found it an enjoyable experience. 63% compared it to the dentist and the experience was fearful.
12.
We were exploring the idea of glasses as a fashion accessory, rather than just a tool to help improve eyesight. We found that 100% of people considered them to be as an accessory. This clashes with our earlier question about actually wearing glasses. Which we found that people do not entirely like glasses. But they still consider them accessories.
13.
We have also researching into guide dogs and found out that they are funded almost entirely through charity organisations. We asked the subjects what they thought about this. Everyone of them said that they should be funded by the government and not made to fend for themselves.
We asked of the audience considered themselves to have good eyesight. Some were wearing glasses, some weren't. Only around a third of people considered themselves to have good eyesight.
15.
We were interested in what the last thing people see when they go to sleep. We received a mixed bag of results, but managed to generalise them into these categories. Quite a few of those answers were people watching TV or Reading a book before going bed. But mostly it was simply lying awake in the dark, waiting to fall asleep.
16.
This chart conforms with our contact lenses over glasses chart from earlier. It appears that most of our audience do not like wearing glasses. Whether they do already or simply don't like the idea is unclear. But as a whole, our audience simply don't like the idea.
17.
We were interested into what our audience considered to be the most amazing thing they'd ever seen. Then we generalised them into four categories. Less than a third said a celebrity or a new born relative. Another third said it was some amazing view, possibly the landscape over a country, or the view from a mountain top.
18.
Linking into our loss of sight question, we wanted to know if people thought they took their own eyesight for granted. A massive proportion of our audience said that they think they take their own eyesight for granted. This is an unsurprising result given our previous question about the audience losing their sight.
19.
We considered the price of glasses frames these days. Oddly only half of our audience thought that glasses needed to be cheaper. Its possible that those asked payed different prices for their frames and prescriptions.
20.
Similarly with our eyesight question we asked if the audience thought they needed glasses. A third of those asked said they needed glasses. Again we asked those who were already wearing glasses. So it shows who actually has glasses.Research videos:
No comments:
Post a Comment